In a word: amazing. Absolutely loved it, every time. The first time I saw it was for my 18th birthday in May last year, unfortunately Ray Quinn has injured his back, so wasn’t playing Danny, but even with the understudy it was still fantastic- so much so that I wanted to go back to see it again (and again!). The third time I saw it wasn’t the best as there were quite a few understudies, so after seeing it with the proper actors/actresses already, it seemed strange, but still really good- which shows how strong a show it is. The second time I saw it was the best, the full cast- especially Ray Quinn- were performing. The whole show is just fantastic! It is in my opinion, better than the film adaptation. It flows better as a show and it really comes alive on stage. The acting, dancing and singing is all brilliant. The singing in particular, is just amazing. Someone once told me that you didn’t have to be that good a singer to perform in the West End, but the cast of Grease, are so much more than that. Probably the best are Ray Quinn (Danny), Emma Stephens (Sandy), Natalie Langston (Rizzo) and Michael Melmoe (Roger). The whole show flows and each character gets their chance to shine. All the love stories between the T-Birds and Pink Ladies are obvious in the muscial, rather than in the film where only Danny and Sandy and Rizzo and Kenickie are focused on. All the main characters get to sing their own solo song too, making them more whole as characters. The choreogrpahy by Arlene Philips was really good, the dances were step-perfect by the ensemble and Ray Quinn’s dance section at the dance contest was fantastic, the lifts were amazing. It was the first musical I had ever seen and the first time I had been to the West End, and it certainly made me want to go back. It even made me think I might quite like work in marketing for theatre.
Pepsi shows ‘wild side’ with online relaunch (Marketing magazine)
“LONDON – PepsiCo is to relaunch its UK website in April, as part of a strategy to shift spend from TV to digital media. The soft-drinks company will support the revamp with a social media campaign in the summer, encouraging consumers to show off their ‘wild side’. This follows Pepsi’s adoption of the strapline ‘Max your wild side’, replacing the previous ‘Max your life’ and ‘Max it’ positioning. The activity will be the first in the UK to use the revamped Pepsi logo. The fresh visual identity, which was introduced in the US last year as part of a £700m global brand makeover, will also be rolled out across Pepsi, Pepsi Max and Diet Pepsi cans to create a more international feel. PepsiCo has already been stepping up its digital activity in the US. During last month’s Super Bowl, it opted to invest in a social media campaign on Facebook rather than run a flagship TV spot, as it had done for the previous 23 years. The Pepsi Fresh Project is an online cause-related marketing drive that asks participants how the company should give away £13m to charities. Traditionally, Pepsi has sought to make an impact during the high-profile sporting event by debuting ads featuring big-name stars such as Britney Spears, Cindy Crawford and Justin Timberlake. PepsiCo will also be using digital media in its attempt to hijack the 2010 Fifa World Cup, which is sponsored by rival Coca-Cola. The first stage of the activity is a 30-second viral ad for Pepsi Max featuring the French striker Thierry Henry. The spot will be launched this week on the website for Sky Sports’ Saturday morning show Soccer AM. However, the company has no plans to move away entirely from traditional advertising. The second phase of its World Cup activity is a TV ad, featuring Chelsea players Frank Lampard and Didier Drogba as well as Liverpool striker Fernando Torres; it will be shown during the summer. From April, PepsiCo plans to increase the size of its Pepsi Max and Diet Pepsi bottles from 500ml to 600ml without raising the price. This is aimed at persuading consumers to switch to sugar-free options. Last year UK sales of Pepsi’s cola range grew at a higher rate than those of market leader Coca-Cola, according to Nielsen. They rose by 6% in the 12 months to October 2009 to reach a value of £267m. Pepsi is still some way behind Coke, which posted sales of £999.4m in the same period; a year-on-year increase of 3.2%.”
————————————————————————————
Everything seems to be changing at the moment! Not sure if it is because I am more aware of these kinds of changes now, or whether this year seems to be the year for change in the way companies do things. Pepsi have decided that their ‘wild side’ campaign would be better online in a viral advert. I think this is a good idea, as they have already invested £700 million in worldwide re-branding, so making use of the viral and social networks online is a good idea. Not only is it virtually free- apart from making the advert- but a most of Pepsi’s target audience are online, so making a viral and tapping into social networking sites means most of their target audience can be reached. This should help Pepsi catch-up with their rivals Coca-Cola in the sales market. Another good thing they are doing is linking the viral/social networking to charity, which gives them a USP. They are asking participants to suggest ways they could give £13million to charities, which is a USP and more importantly, one that Coca-Cola does not have. However, donation to charities is not necessarily something that will attract their usual target audience. Although the younger generations are becoming more charitable. But what this might do for Pepsi is give them a whole new market too. The enlargement of the bottles of Diet and Max are a good idea too, as in an ever-conscious society it gives the consumer two things- a drink that is better value for money and better for their health- two more reasons for them to switch from Coca-Cola to Pepsi, hopefully breaking the brand loyalty that so many have to Coca-Cola. I think these plans are extremely good marketing techniques and should raise Pepsi’s profits. It is good though they they are not moving away from television advertising altogether though, as that is still the most effective- albeit expensive- method of advertising. But like the BBC are changing, Pepsi is too, rising to the challenge and thinking of new ways to attracts the consumer.
Newspaper publishers rally against BBC plans for mobile apps (From media week)
“LONDON – Newspaper groups have attacked the BBC’s plans to launch a range of free news and sport apps, claiming it will undermine commercial publishers in a “potentially” important’ sector. Yesterday, the BBC announced it was developing news and sports apps for the iPhone, set to roll out before this summer’s FIFA World Cup. The apps will then be adapted for the BlackBerry and Android operating systems. The Newspaper Publishers Association (NPA) said the move did not constitute an extension of an existing service, but rather an “entirely new service” and should therefore be subject to a Public Value Test. NPA director David Newell said: “Not for the first time, the BBC is preparing to muscle into a nascent market and trample over the aspirations of commercial news providers. We strongly urge the BBC Trust to block these damaging plans,” “The market for iPhone news apps is a unique and narrow commercial space, which means that the potential for market distortion by the BBC is much greater.” At this week’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, the BBC’s director of future media and technology, Erik Huggers, defended the plans, arguing that licence fee- payers were demanding access to digital content, “at a time and place that suits them”. Members of the NPA include Associated Newspapers, the London Evening Standard, the Financial Times, Guardian News & Media, Independent Newspapers, MGN, News International and Telegraph Media Group.”
From: http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/news/bulletin/mediapm/article/984867/?DCMP=EMC-MediaPMBulletin
————————————————————————————–
Creating apps for the iPhone will make the BBC even more accessible. Sport and news are the most popular genres of the BBC’s website and are the genres people most want access to when they are not at home near a television or computer; for example to check the latest scores or to read the headlines peopler are talking about. I think that this links in well with the BBC’s plans- spoken about by Pete Clifton- to introduce more technology to the BBC. It links in well with the iPlayer now on the Wii console. It means that the BBC is incredibly more available to everyone wherever they are. The iPhone already plays host to things such as an ’Orange Wednesdays’ app, so a BBC news and sport one I think is more appropriate. It will help the BBC gain a younger audience as well, they can just take their iPhone’s out of their pockets and look at the headlines if someone mentions something on the journey home that they think sounds interesting or dramatic. Although, I can see why newspapers are worried about this. It means people will not be looking in their newspapers or on their websites for the scores or the news. But, the BBC is only updating and modernising, which really the newspapers should do too. I think the newspapers should not become complacent and this will certainly make sure they do not, this is doing to newspapers what is happening to the BBC at the moment- creating competition and most importantly, creating a challenge they have to rise to. However, on saying this, I do not think that newspapers will become entirely extint and redundant just because of one iPhone app, people do still want the tradition of reading a newspaper.
Critical Reflection on 72-Hour Challenge
For the 100MC coursework, I completed a critical reflection on our 72-hour challenge piece.
163MKT Coursework
In this piece of coursework, I had to create an advertising report for a fictional company ‘Mamma Mia’. The company was looking to re-brand and wanted a marketing strategy for which to do this. This consisted of market research to suggest re-branding ideas and then advertising strategies and creative ideas for the company.
140MC Work
As a group we formed an advertising agency and we all took on roles, mine being Media Planner (with some creative ideas too)
We were given the following brief:
“Dear Paul
Thank you for getting in touch. Here at JoeSoap we’re really excited about our new product range launch and we’ll be very interested to see what your agency can offer.
This is a completely new range of products so we are looking for an agency to design the packaging for the product, to create a positive bran image and to come up with a national advertising campaign for the range as a whole.
We feel that your idea of a boxed gift set is very exciting and we would be thrilled to hear morer about how you would design that.
Our strategy is to launch the product range at the start of May 2010 with the intrention of making a big push for Fathers’ Day 20 June. The advertising campaign will be for the whole range up til then. After that we anticipate that we may look at advertising specific producs from the range seperately, but we will be interested to hear your views on the advisability of that.
The initial advertising budget is £800,000. The fee for package design would be additional to this and is negotiable.
Kind regards
Felicity Goodbody
Brand Champion & Marketing Director
Joe Soap For Men”
Here are the slides from our creative pitch:
141MC Coursework
My coursework pieces from 141MC. The first piece is a group report:
The second part of the coursework was an advert based on the report:
Lecture on disability in advertising and our advert
Synopsis of lecture:
Disabled people are excluded from mainstream adverts, despite there being 11 million disabled people in the UK. The stereotype of disabled people is someone in a wheelchair, however only 2.2% of those who are disabled are actually in wheelchairs. There was a case where a female childrens presenter on cBeebies was disabled- she had the bottom half of her arm missing- and after he first time presenting on the programme there were 8,000 complaints to the BBC about her being on the television, these consisted of comments like ; “it forced me to talk to my children about disability”. There are very few disabled people represented in television adverts and very few agencies which hire disabled models. However, there is to be a break-through, as Coronation Street is to have its first disabled character but this is particularly different as the storyline will not focus on the fact that she is in a wheelchair. Big Brother also treats the disabled differently, they make a ‘big deal’ out of them and treat them in a different way to the other contestants. Disabled people tend to be viewed from one point, the physical point, rather than from multiple points, like personality etc, but you woul not judge someone who is not disabled in this way. Every disabled person is different, like every non disabled person is, disabled people have personalities. There should be more disabled people as characters or in adverts etc- promoting their quality of life- why does the disablity have to diminish the person? Don’t show them in plain clothes. 47% of people become disabled within their working lives (20-50yrs old). And finally, although there are many disabled charities that advertise and do fantastic work, they actually amplify the disablitiy and the need for help.
Critical Reflection
There really is a great exclusion of the disabled from adverts, I cannot ever remember seeing someone with a disability in an advert, yet I see people with disabilites all the time- working, shopping and living their lives, so why can they not be included in adverts doing all these things? I must admit that before the lecture, my instant thought, my stereotypical image of someone who is disabled is someone in a wheelchair- this is probably because the only disabled characters on television are those in wheelchairs.
The 8,000 complaints there were about the presenter on cBeebies I find astonishing. I cannot believe how parents could find the presenter ‘inappropriate’ – she was a fantastic presenter and the children loved her. Children are shielded from enough as it is, they only see perfection on television, so in letting their programmes be presented by a disabled person itroduces them to the idea of disability and makes it part of their everyday life and stops it from becoming a prejudice in their minds- so I do not know how parents could complain about broadening their children’s minds, thoughts and beliefs.
In regards to disabled characters in soaps, there has been characters in wheelchairs before. In Coronation Street, Ryan’s friend was in a wheelchair and the storyline did not focus on his disability. However, the character of Hayley in Hollyoaks did have storylines quite heavily focused on her being in a wheelchair, but mainly to highlight the prejudices she came up against. For example when someone heard her singing they wanted her in their band, but when they saw it was her and that she was in a wheelchair they no longer wanted her as their lead singer. Also when she fell pregnant, all her friends and her brother thought she would not be able to cope because she was in a wheelchair, which of course was not true. The storylines for Hayley’s character, although focused on her being in a wheelchair, still had a positive effect as they highlighted the prejudices she came up against and how she overcame them and how her life was the same as everyone else’s- something she often said in the soap; why should she be any different because she’s in a wheelchair. But I do feel that it is a good thing the new character in Coronation Street’s storylines won’t focus on her disability, because, like the character of Hayley, it should not stop her doing anything and most importantly being herself and having a personality, which Hayley certainly did. Also, in regards to disabled characters often being put in plain clothes, Hollyoaks never did this to Hayley, the character always wore what any young, twenty-something girl would wear.
I think that every disabled person should be treated the same as anyone without a disability when on any kind of programme etc. – game show, reality, acting or modelling- the disability most certainly does not have to diminish the person and if the disabled person doesn’t let their disability effect their life, then why should others make it do so? The disability should be acknowledged, but then almost ignored as it does not make them less of a person. People should be judged by their personalities and negativity towards a person should be based on bad attitudes, or bad traits in that person, not by how they look. But unfortunately in a modern society where appearance is key, this is unlikely to happen.
After the lecture on 18/2/10 we were asked in groups to create an advert. The brief was to be based on an origianl one given by ‘Clarks’ and was as follows:
And we decided to create an advert that showed someone with a disability included in a group, doing something simple and regular as jumping, because they loved their new ‘Clarks’ shoes so much. We decided that the person with the disability should not be in the centre, as this would attract attention and in doing this, making sure the audience who look at the advert don’t even see the disability at first. Also to show that ‘Clarks’ is for everyone and everyone is included. Also to make the disability not a “big deal” at all- as the brief said. This is our advert:
The Brits 2010
After watching it last night I felt I needed to write about it as a media piece. I’ve watched the Brits for many years, but this year I found it such a strange programme to watch. It seemed disjointed, which could be due to the audio being constantly muted. It was probably because it was live and live television often doesn’t make very comfortable or easy viewing at all, but especially last night, as it seemed un-rehearsed. Critics suggested it was because it is live and in the huge venue the audience cannot hear and do not listen properly, so don’t laugh at the jokes or applaud at the correct times. But I really think it makes for uncomfortable viewing and it is about time the pre-recorded it. Peter Kay made quite a good presenter, but even he couldn’t smooth over the cracks in the gallery- he had late cues back from commercial breaks and the VT’s were not smoothly placed in. If they were to pre-record it, it would be smoother and they could edit out things that the celebrities said instead of muting the audio and they could edit out people going the wrong way, gaps and delays etc. I know then though, that it wouldn’t have the controversy that the Brits is infamous for, but it would be much easier to watch at home. At the moment and in particular last night, it didn’t seem to focus on the actual awards for some reason, but more on the speeches and not really either on the performances. There were also problems with audios and ear pieces as well as the VT’s, which for such an organisation as the Brits and ITV I find slightly unacceptable. In particular Cheryl Cole’s (who I found almost unrecognisable, despite being a huge Girls Aloud fan, probably due to the amount of airbrushed photographs in magazines- but that is a whole other debate) performance was out of sync, which I found completely unfair to her as simply doing that performance was hard enough for her. Compared to other awards shows such as the BAFTA’s, Oscars, and various ’soap awards’, it seemed almost amateur. If they pre-recorded the Brits, it could reach the standard of the other award shows.
The New Domestic Violence adverts (Feb 2010)
I saw this advert on television for the first time the other day. I think it is such a brilliant advert. Although it shocked me at first, by the time it ended I just thought it was really really good. It is similar to the Women’s Aid advert starring Kiera Knightley (link at the bottom- no embedding code available – figure 1) except it is less hard-hitting. I feel it is a good idea to advertise for awareness of something so important as doemstic violence, as it effects so many women every year. It also is effective that they have targeted a younger, teenage audience, as it can happen to them as well, but it is so less likely that they would discuss it with anyone, probably because they feel even more alone and isolated than adults. The issue of teenage domestic violence was addressed in teen soap ‘Hollyoaks’ (see figure 2) which was hard-hitting but highlighted the issue brilliantly. I think that the new adverts for domestic violence are just the right balance between being effective, something that makes a lasting impression and something that goes too far- like the Women’s Aid advert was deemed to, as it was banned. I belive it is a much better use of advertising revenue and air time than the NHS’s new drinking adverts (see figure 3) as I feel they are pointless in the way they do not make a big enough deterrant to the target audience to stop drinking- something the audience have done as a part of their lives for so long. Whereas the new domestic violence adverts highlight an important issue, not just for the perpetrators or victims, but for those around them, the advert leaves a memory on their minds; whether the outcome be that they think before they hit the next time, or are hit the next time, or when someone they know shows signs of domestic abuse. The advert is a good length and just as you are wondering when it will stop, the character hitting the window appears and then the slogan. Some critics are already saying that it is not just females that suffer abuse, according to statistics 25% of teenage girls suffer domestic violence and a shocking 18% of boys are vitcims too. Some critics suggest that therefore the adverts are sexist, but whilst I agree that both issues should be tackled, it is one at a time and to suggest that it is a sexist advert is a bit strong. I think that there are too many domestic abuse adverts that are banned so to have one that is effective and more importantly is allowed to be aired, means that critics should not be so quick to judge. I think it is really effective to have the abuser or victim (like in the Women’s Aid advert) shown seperately and detached from their abusive or victim state, to show how they are normal and real people and that the abuse does not have to be constantly happening, it can just be infrequent occassions, but it is still serious. I really do feel this is a good advert and really gets the message across.
[Figure 1] Women’s aid advert- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AegdywmDZ60
[Figure 2] Hollyoaks – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMXjMXy9N9I
[Figure 3] NHS advert - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2a5ICC0Iw0




















